Fuel Rationing During the 2026 Iran War

One of the things I’m following during this Iran War are the policies that governments are putting in to place to alleviate the impacts of the crude oil shock from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Of concern for programs like the California LCFS is whether the US will implement policy changes that either raise or lower gasoline demand (independent of the demand destruction from higher oil prices).

Below I have a table, that is current as of today (April 1st, 2026) of the policies being implemented around the world. I’ve ranked them from most to least impactful to the consumer. If we were to have full fuel rationing (as during the during the 1970s oil crises), the demand destruction would be far more significant but the consumer pain would be far higher than as if other policies were implemented, like temporarily suspending the gasoline excise tax.

So far no jurisdiction has proposed suspending their carbon program like the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, but if the shortages get worse, it could be on the table. I’m most closely watching which jurisdictions suspend fuel excise taxes, as I believe those moves are precedences to the possibility of suspending carbon programs. Both policies lower the price of fuel, and thereby increase demand for that fuel; during an oil crisis these policies are not designed to lower fossil fuel demand, but rather to lower the political backlash from higher fuel prices from the oil supply shock.

Of note is that some mitigation strategies (e.g. removing fuel taxes) alleviate pain for the consumer, but ultimately end up increasing oil demand by artificially lowering the price of fuel. Other measures (e.g. lower speed limits) lower fuel demand but are more politically unpopular.

When we look at the types of counties implementing different types of mitigation measures we see that the hardest hit countries (e.g. Bangladesh and Sri Lanka) are implementing emergency measures that reduce fuel demand the most, but at a very high cost to the consumer – measures such as fuel rationing, driving restrictions, and mandated work from home.

Countries like the United States and Australia are implementing measures that are more politically palatable – like relaxing fuel specs and releasing strategic petroleum reserves – but which ultimately dig the hole deeper by increasing fuel demand by artificially lowering fuel prices.

Perhaps most importantly is that many of these countries are following the playbook set out by the IEA. On March 20th the IEA issued a 10-point-plan of strategies to ease the impacts of the current oil shock. The plan includes things such as mandated work from home (reminiscent of the COVID lockdowns), lowering speed limits (as done during the 1970s via the National Maximum Speed Law, without which we wouldn’t have Sammy Hagar’s song “I Can’t Drive 55“), and alternating driving days (which we also saw in the US during the 1970s with “odd/even rationing“).

Interestingly, as you can see in the table below, the United States hasn’t followed a single recommendation from the IEA, and every single action the United States has taken so far (suspending the Jones Act, removing sanctions on Iranian and Russian oil, releasing the strategic petroleum reserve) are designed to lower the price of oil, which increases demand for oil.

Action

Example

Effect

Consumer Pain

(0-10)

Recommended by IEA[1]

Implemented

Fuel rationing

Weekly cap on number of liters per person

Lowers Demand

10

 

Bangladesh flag Bangladesh[2]

Indonesia flag Indonesia (50l/vehicle/day)[3]

Kenya flag Kenya[4]

Myanmar flag Myanmar

Slovakia flag Slovakia (full tank + 10l)[5]

Slovenia flag Slovenia (50l/day/person 200l/day/business)[6]

Sri Lanka flag Sri Lanka (15l/week)[7]

Priority fuel allocation to essential sectors

Hospitals and government get fuel first

Lowers Demand

9

 

 

Alternate driving days

Odd/even license plate fill ups

Lowers Demand

9

IEA logo

Myanmar flag Myanmar (odd/even rationing)[8]

Sri Lanka flag Sri Lanka (odd/even rationing)[9]

Driving restrictions

Car free Sundays / no-drive zones / congestion charges / parking restrictions / staggered start times

Lowers Demand

8

 

United Kingdom flag London (pre-war congestion charge)[10]

Italy flag Milan (pre-war congestion charge)[11]

United States flag New York City (pre-war congestion charge)[12]

Norway flag Norway (pre-war congestion charge)[13]

Singapore flag Singapore (pre-war congestion charge)[14]

Sweden flag Stockholm (pre-war congestion charge)[15]

 

Lower speed limits

55 MPH highway speed limit

Lowers Demand

7

IEA logo

Pakistan flag Pakistan (100 kph)[16]

Curfew

Restaurants closed by 9PM

Lowers Demand

7

 

Egypt flag Egypt (9pm restaurant curfew)[17]

4 day workweek mandate

 

Lowers Demand

7

 

Laos flag Laos (4 day work week)[18]

Pakistan flag Pakistan (4 day work week, schools shut)[19]

Philippines flag Philippines (4 day week for govt agencies)[20]

Sri Lanka flag Sri Lanka (4 day work and school)[21]

Work from home mandate

Work from home, remote schooling

Lowers Demand

6

IEA logo

British Columbia flagBC Unions advocating[22]

Bangladesh flag Bangladesh (universities closed)[23]

Cambodia flag Cambodia (public sector WFH)[24]

Egypt flag Egypt (1 day/week mandated WFH)[25]

Indonesia flag Indonesia (1 day/week mandated WFH)[26]

Pakistan flag Pakistan (1/2 of public sector WFH)[27]

Thailand flag Thailand (public sector WFH)[28]

Vietnam flag Vietnam[29]

Reduce business flights

 

Lowers Demand for Jet Fuel

6

IEA logo

Cambodia flag Cambodia (public sector travel restrictions)[30]

Egypt flag Egypt (public sector travel restrictions)[31]

Indonesia flag Indonesia (public sector travel restrictions)[32]

Malaysia flag Malaysia (public sector travel restrictions)[33]

Nepal flag Nepal (public sector travel restrictions)[34]

Pakistan flag Pakistan (public sector travel restrictions) [35]

Philippines flag Philippines (public sector travel restrictions) [36]

Sri Lanka flag Sri Lanka (public sector travel restrictions) [37]

Thailand flag Thailand (public sector travel restrictions) [38]

Vietnam flag Vietnam (public sector travel restrictions) [39]

Encourage carpooling

More HOV lanes, subsidies for carpooling

Lowers Demand

6

IEA logo

 

Encourage commercial vehicle efficiency efforts

Freight consolidation, truck speed limits, shift freight to rail

Lowers Demand

6

IEA logo

 

Eliminate price caps / subsidies

 

Increases Demand

6

 

Thailand flag Thailand (eliminated diesel price cap)[40]

United Arab Emirates flag UAE (reduced price subsidy)[41]

Implement Fuel price cap / subsidy

 

Increases Demand

5 (higher risk of shortages)

 

South Korea flag South Korea (gasoline price cap)[42]

Spain flag Spain (diesel fuel subsidy)[43]

Limit non-essential fuel use

Recreational boating, private aviation, motorsports

Lowers Demand

5

 

Pakistan flag Pakistan (no cricket attendance in person)[44]

Encourage public transit

Free public transit, bus priority lanes

Lowers Demand

4

IEA logo

Philippines flag Philippines (free buses)[45]

Australia flagTasmania Australia (free public transit)[46]

Australia flag Victoria Australia (free public transit)[47]

 

Anti-idling

 

Lowers Demand

4

 

United States flag New York City (pre-war program)[48]

Relax fuel specs

Suspend special blend requirements, relax ethanol limits

Increases Demand

4

 

Argentina flag Argentina (E15)[49]

Australia flag Australia (higher sulfur ppm)[50]

Indonesia flag Indonesia (B50)[51]

Philippines flag Philippines (Euro II spec)[52]

Thailand flag Thailand (B20)[53]

United States flag USA (E15 year round)[54]

Export restrictions on fuels

 

Increases Demand

2

 

China flag China[55]

Russia flag Russia[56]

Serbia flag Serbia[57]

South Korea flag South Korea (naphtha)[58]

Thailand flag Thailand[59]

Tax reductions on fuels

 

Increases Demand

2 (budget shorfalls)

 

Albania flag Albania[60]

Argentina flag Argentina[61]

Australia flag Australia[62]

Austria flag Austria[63]

Barbados flag Barbados[64]

Brazil flag Brazil[65]

Cambodia flag Cambodia[66]

Chile flag Chile[67]

Croatia flag Croatia[68]

India flag India[69]

Ireland flag Ireland[70]

Italy flag Italy[71]

Laos flag Laos[72]

Latvia flag Latvia[73]

Namibia flag Namibia[74]

Philippines flag Philippines[75]

Poland flag Poland[76]

Portugal flag Portugal[77]

Serbia flag Serbia[78]

Slovenia flag Slovenia[79]

Spain flag Spain[80]

Sweden flag Sweden[81]

Turkey flag Turkey[82]

Vietnam flag Vietnam[83]

Suspending carbon programs for fuels

Suspend LCFS

Increases Demand

2 (higher pollution)

 

 

SPR

Releasing strategic petroleum reserves

Increases Demand

2

 

Australia flag Australia[84]

Japan flag Japan[85]

United States flag USA[86]

Eliminating sanctions on oil

 

Increases Demand

1

 

Bangladesh flag Bangladesh (Russia)[87]

Indonesia flag Indonesia (Russia)[88]

Philippines flag Philippines (Russia)[89]

Sri Lanka flag Sri Lanka (Russia)[90]

South Korea flag South Korea (Russian naphtha)[91]

Thailand flag Thailand (Russia)[92]

United States flag USA (Iran, Russia)[93]

Vietnam flag Vietnam (Russia)[94]

Cut tariffs on fuel imports

 

Increases Demand

1

 

Vietnam flag Vietnam[95]

Suspending cabotage

Suspend Jones Act

Increases Demand

1

 

United States flag USA (Jones Act)[96]

Shift multi-fuel vehicles from LPG to gasoline

 

Increases Demand for LPG, Raises demand for gasoline

1

IEA logo

India flag India (diverting LPG from industry to households)[97]

Encourage petrochemical feedstock switching

 

Lowers demand for LPG, raises demand for other feedstocks

1

IEA logo

 

Encourage electric cooking versus LPG

 

Lowers Demand for LPG

1

IEA logo

 

Encourage EVs

EV subsidies

Lowers Demand

1

 

Cambodia flag Cambodia (Reduced EV tariffs)[98]

 

Will Martin's Blog